若您查核AI生成的内容属实,不涉及抄袭或违反著作权,并获得导师、期刊编辑或出版单位的认可,确定能够在研究论文中运用ChatGPT、Midjourney、DALL-E、Bard……等AI工具所生成的文字或图像,应该如何引用呢?
对于引用生成式AI的内容,目前APA、MLA、Chicago Manual Style已经发布较明确的规范与实例,提供写作者参考;期刊出版社也陆续发表相关声明,提醒投稿者留意。本文汇整学术引用格式官方网站、国外大学图书馆的指引,以及出版社网页的信息。
一、引用格式官方网站
APA Style Blog: How to cite ChatGPT.
https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/how-to-cite-chatgpt
MLA Style Center: How do I cite generative AI in MLA style?
https://style.mla.org/citing-generative-ai/
The Chicago Manual of Style Online: How do you recommend citing content developed or generated by artificial intelligence, such as ChatGPT? https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/qanda/data/faq/topics/Documentation/faq0422.html
二、国外大学图书馆指引
学校 | 网页 | 引用格式实例 |
The University of British Columbia | Generative AI and ChatGPT | APA, Chicago, IEEE, MLA, Vancouver |
New Jersey Institute of Technology | Citing ChatGPT and other AI generated content | APA, Chicago, IEEE, MLA |
The University of Queensland | ChatGPT and other generative AI tools | APA, AGLC, Chicago, MLA, Vancouver |
Victoria University | IEEE Referencing: Generative AI | IEEE |
University of Waterloo Library | ChatGPT and Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): AI-generated content and citation | APA, Chicago, IEEE, JAMA, MLA |
Purdue University Library | How to Cite AI Generated Content | APA, Chicago, IEEE, MLA |
James Cook University Library | Citing material created by AI software | APA, AMA, AGLC, Harvard, MLA, IEEE, Chicago |
三、出版社与学会
四、学术组织
COPE (The Committee on Publication Ethic, 出版道德委员会): Authorship and AI tools.
https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author
五、参考数据
期刊文章
- Casal, J. E., & Kessler, M. (2023). Can linguists distinguish between ChatGPT/AI and human writing?: A study of research ethics and academic publishing. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(3), 100068. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772766123000289?via%3Dihub
- Caulfield, J. (2023, August 15). ChatGPT Citations | Formats & Examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/ai-tools/chatgpt-citations/
- Conroy, G. (2023, September 8). Scientific sleuths spot dishonest ChatGPT use in papers. Nature. https://nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02477-w
- Nature (2023, January 24). Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use. Nature, 613. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00191-1
- Walters, W. H. & Wilder, E. I. (2023). Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT. Scientific Reports, 13, 14045. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-41032-5
关于生成式AI在写作方面的运用,请诚实说明你如何运用此工具做发想或规划,即使你没有直接拷贝内文到你的报告中。由于AI 生成内容的数据源无法回溯、取得或提供直接链接,所以应截图备份、另存新档,并标示使用日期。切勿引用 ChatGPT 作为事实信息的来源(如:名词解释的定义),因为AI生成的信息不一定正确,仅是文字接龙,内容具随机性,并非即时搜索网路,使用时务必谨慎查证。
最后,提醒您缴交课程作业、投稿论文前,务必再次前往引文格式官网或出版社网站确认最新规定!
by Chih-Lo Chen (2024/3/25更新)